From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDBC26DE110A for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 18:19:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.007 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.007 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bg-9WB3s-scQ for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 18:19:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 428406DE1050 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 18:19:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bm9hz-0000ea-09; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:18:51 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 2495 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 20 Sep 2016 01:18:56 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Mark Walters , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] emacs: add tag jump menu In-Reply-To: <1474218271-8312-2-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> References: <1474218271-8312-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> <1474218271-8312-2-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 22:18:56 -0300 Message-ID: <87a8f3tlkv.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 01:19:03 -0000 Mark Walters writes: > Add a "jump" style menu for doing tagging operations. > --- I wasn't too sure about the whole "k r" thing, but playing with it, I find the UI reasonable. I propose polishing up the documentation and including the first patch in 0.23 (whose freeze I will get around to announcing any day now). The second patch does exactly impliment my feature request, so thanks for that. I need a bit more time to play with it, both to decide if it really helps with my workflows, also to decide if I'm the only one who uses such workflows. d