From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19EB76DE0F56
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 24 May 2019 18:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.04
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.04 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.039, 
 SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled
Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id DASHAD0X0hsp for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
 Fri, 24 May 2019 18:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197])
 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81E996DE0F51
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 24 May 2019 18:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.89)
 (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)
 id 1hULbQ-0007zL-6T; Fri, 24 May 2019 21:36:04 -0400
Received: (nullmailer pid 31975 invoked by uid 1000);
 Sat, 25 May 2019 01:36:10 -0000
From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>,
 Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] cli/show: emit new whole-message crypto status
 output
In-Reply-To: <878suv5vbz.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
References: <20190520032228.27420-1-dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
 <20190520032228.27420-5-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> <87mujdsav0.fsf@tethera.net>
 <87ef4n62d9.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <878suv5vbz.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 22:36:10 -0300
Message-ID: <87a7fbnwmt.fsf@tethera.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 May 2019 01:36:06 -0000

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> writes:

>
> or, should we just make the crypto member always present?
>

That was what I was thinking, sorry to be less explicit than I could
have been.

> Another alternative is to condition the presence of the crypto member on
> the arguments (like if --verify is set), but the decision for --decrypt
> is a bit awkward because of our default of --decrypt=auto.
>