From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7926DE0F35 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 04:09:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.061 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.061 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.060, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ClifzrozLRxQ for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 04:08:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B6EE6DE0A43 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 04:08:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iXlGY-0004Oj-9r; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 07:08:54 -0500 Received: (nullmailer pid 335618 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:08:53 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor , Antoine =?utf-8?Q?Beaupr?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9?= , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Debian packaging cleanup In-Reply-To: <87lfsaj6nl.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> References: <20191110173748.25792-1-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> <87r22d6qqy.fsf@curie.anarc.at> <87lfsaj6nl.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:08:53 -0400 Message-ID: <87a78p8m96.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:09:03 -0000 Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > On Tue 2019-11-12 10:47:33 -0500, Antoine Beaupr=C3=A9 wrote: >> On 2019-11-10 12:37:42, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >>> This series offers a set of simple and small changes to the debian >>> packaging for notmuch. they apply to the master branch. >> >> Looks good to me. > > Anarcat has reviewed these, but they're still tagged > notmuch::needs-review in nmbug. should i clear these tags now that > they've been reviewed by someone who knows something about debian > packaging? > Go for it. d