From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403DF431FB6
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:07:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.799
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
	FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id qIssMC8Bo9hJ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:07:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com
	[209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE4A3431FAF
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:07:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by bkat2 with SMTP id t2so4923084bka.26
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:07:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id
	:mime-version:content-type;
	bh=KsE0wo0GVateuB2/NEQMDcNN5LubiT1SSXy4tM+Pe2M=;
	b=KQCEmqlnkFwdObDXHMRKDxiKflxVGbUJVtgA6zPISIYHS4NAQjAWrfZWiW22+W7mjI
	U+uYeHTuK7TOsHly5c4+SkNITtteXM/sCqPXVfH9HpQ6rRo/PLWXtv1Donn0axHrpxaB
	F/cv7KvVaBiGIM2Egpcg1ivom8D9IQUxPZjw0=
Received: by 10.204.152.219 with SMTP id h27mr5254508bkw.75.1326737229467;
	Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:07:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([91.144.186.21])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ig13sm8946539bkc.9.2012.01.16.10.07.08
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
	Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:07:08 -0800 (PST)
From: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>,
	notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] cli: slightly refactor "notmuch reply" address
 scanning functions
In-Reply-To: <871ur2jo6z.fsf@zancas.localnet>
References: <cover.1326551350.git.jani@nikula.org>
	<f994789d065d898911bbf127a7453137a9ba8e27.1326551350.git.jani@nikula.org>
	<871ur2jo6z.fsf@zancas.localnet>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+68~gab6495e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:06:15 +0400
Message-ID: <878vl78qug.fsf@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:07:11 -0000

Hello.

Since this patches got in, I have yet to send a single email to the
address(es) I intend to :( I am really used to the bindings and this
change is a pain.  From IRC discussion, it seems like I am not alone
here.

There was a proposal to change reply bindings to 'ra' and 'rs'.  When
'r' is pressed an appropriate help message can be given in the
minibuffer.  I like this proposal.  What do others think?

If others like it, how about reverting to the old bindings until the new
ones are implemented?

Regards,
  Dmitry