From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DCFE431FAF for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:31:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id awUkNuaLR2pb for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:31:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2259F431FAE for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:31:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034089108.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net ([156.34.89.108] helo=zancas.localnet) by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SN1No-0000Ua-8k; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:31:44 -0300 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SN1NN-0000ys-Sq; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:31:17 -0300 From: David Bremner To: "notmuch" Subject: priorities for 0.13 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+113~gde05574 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:31:17 -0300 Message-ID: <878vhkvvqi.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam_bar: - X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:31:45 -0000 Hi All; I'd like to have a feature freeze for 0.13 sometime in the first week of May. What do people feel are priorities to try to get reviewed and pushed for 0.13? d