From: David Bremner <bremner@debian.org>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debian: package ruby bindings
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:35:41 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878v48om5u.fsf@zancas.localnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMP44s2RuAGjJV089swpjwG9i5X=sARPYve6XZPyK7X7QwZBDg@mail.gmail.com>
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:34 AM, David Bremner <bremner@debian.org> wrote:
>>
>> OK, but that doesn't really help us deal with support requests e.g. on IRC.
>> Some "feature requests" for the bindings:
>
> Can you point to some of these requests, or are they hypothetical?
I don't know how many support requests we've got, but yes, I remember at
least one.
> Moreover, wouldn't making sure that the bindings are package mostly
> solve this issue?
Well, people wouldn't have to build and install the bindings, _if_ they
happened to be using an OS with packages available. But not everyone
uses binary packages. I guess for me it's just a software quality issue
to have some minimal level of documentation.
>> 1. Add a short README describing how to build, and how to read the docs
>> (it looks like there is a public)
>>
>> 2. Add a couple tests at least reaching the (low) bar set by the python
>> bindings
>>
>> 3. Build and install the docs locally as part of the (in-progress)
>> debian package
>
> That would be good, but it's out of scope for this patch.
That's why they're feature requests.
On the other hand, there is some time to clean things up since I won't
upload new packages to Debian before the next notmuch release. And I do
consider uploading a package to Debian to be an extra personal
responsibility, especially when it is part of notmuch that I am not
maintaining.
all the best,
d
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-23 23:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-03 23:27 [PATCH] debian: package ruby bindings Felipe Contreras
2013-04-13 4:32 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-04-13 6:14 ` Tomi Ollila
2013-04-13 6:49 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-04-13 11:35 ` David Bremner
2013-04-13 14:49 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-04-13 15:00 ` David Bremner
2013-04-13 15:03 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-04-13 15:31 ` David Bremner
2013-04-14 13:52 ` David Bremner
2013-04-15 1:19 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-04-15 10:24 ` David Bremner
2013-04-16 18:38 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-04-15 10:34 ` David Bremner
2013-04-15 17:13 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-04-23 23:35 ` David Bremner [this message]
2013-04-24 7:20 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-04-28 7:18 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-04-29 1:22 ` David Bremner
2013-04-29 5:34 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-04-29 10:38 ` David Bremner
2013-04-29 17:57 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-04-29 18:16 ` Carl Worth
2013-04-29 18:30 ` Felipe Contreras
2017-03-12 16:11 ` David Bremner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://notmuchmail.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878v48om5u.fsf@zancas.localnet \
--to=bremner@debian.org \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=notmuch@notmuchmail.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).