From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F706DE02D2 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 18:22:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.476 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.476 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.268, URIBL_SBL=0.644, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yJ8vetzyWz3y for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 18:22:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gitolite.debian.net (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E00E6DE01F5 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2015 18:22:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by gitolite.debian.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiBWA-0004GF-JE; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 01:21:42 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 4511 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 03 Oct 2015 01:21:23 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Allan Streib , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Bug/Issue: References header doesn't wrap in emacs package In-Reply-To: <87si5t1nhu.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <87612qwh04.fsf@viking.dsc.soic.indiana.edu> <87si5t1nhu.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+93~g33c8777 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 22:21:23 -0300 Message-ID: <878u7k21d8.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2015 01:22:52 -0000 David Bremner writes: > Allan Streib writes: > >> Notmuch/0.20.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 >> >> Replying to a message in a deeply nested thread can trigger a complaint: >> >> sendmail: command failed: 550 5.7.1 Delivery not authorized, message refused: Message is not RFC 2822 compliant >> >> The problem is a References header that is too long/not wrapped. >> > > Hi Allan; > > Thanks for the report. I can see how notmuch-reply would generate a > long references header in that situation. We rely on message-mode (part > of Gnus) to actually send the message, and it isn't clear to me yet if > message-mode (or some function it invokes) normally folds long headers. I have reported this as an emacs bug. http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21608