From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031126DE02CD for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 17:23:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.007 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.007 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JRJ1XKv6k-4x for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 17:23:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DFBE6DE02C9 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 17:23:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bi9aw-0000kG-M5; Thu, 08 Sep 2016 20:23:02 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 1640 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:23:07 -0000 From: David Bremner To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] test/crypto: hard code fingerprint In-Reply-To: <20160908121251.22490-1-david@tethera.net> References: <20160908121251.22490-1-david@tethera.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.22.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 21:23:07 -0300 Message-ID: <878tv1ly50.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:23:10 -0000 David Bremner writes: > Originally the intent was to make the test more robust against changing > test keys. It turns out that (unscientifically) gpg --with-colons output > changes more often than our test key. Rather than making the script more > complex, just hard code the fingerprint. pushed d