From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC276DE1F2D for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 12:08:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.005 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.005 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ywbh68RfRlVl for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 12:08:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CBC36DE1F22 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 12:08:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1chidR-0006aD-Gx; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 15:08:05 -0500 Received: (nullmailer pid 23447 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 25 Feb 2017 20:08:42 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org, eg@gaute.vetsj.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] test: add known broken test for uncaught DatabaseModifiedError In-Reply-To: <87k28e6r72.fsf@nikula.org> References: <20170225034513.19427-1-david@tethera.net> <20170225034513.19427-2-david@tethera.net> <87k28e6r72.fsf@nikula.org> Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 16:08:42 -0400 Message-ID: <878tou119x.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 20:08:45 -0000 Jani Nikula writes: >> + >> +add_email_corpus > > Is the whole corpus necessary? Just add a single message? Good point, that's actually leftover from a previous failed attempt. >> +test_begin_subtest "catching DatabaseModifiedError in _notmuch_message_ensure_metadata" >> +test_subtest_known_broken >> +test_C ${MAIL_DIR} <<'EOF' > > I'm not entirely thrilled by the whole test_C thing, but I guess I've > lost that battle... :/ > >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +int >> +main (int argc, char **argv) >> +{ >> + pid_t child; > > Leftover variable? correct. > How about add_message with a specific message-id, and using that here? I > think we rely too much on the test corpus and hard-code stuff from there > too much. Good idea.