From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9626DE1623 for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2017 11:30:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.005 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.005 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r7y-7RaeNy9w for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2017 11:30:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25AEF6DE161F for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2017 11:30:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ckFNH-0002AP-JZ; Sat, 04 Mar 2017 14:29:51 -0500 Received: (nullmailer pid 3310 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 04 Mar 2017 19:30:29 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Mark Walters , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Test: emacs: test for folding long headers. In-Reply-To: <1488649637-19006-2-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> References: <1488649637-19006-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> <1488649637-19006-2-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2017 15:30:29 -0400 Message-ID: <878tokalgq.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2017 19:30:35 -0000 Mark Walters writes: > Headers of more than 998 characters should be folded when sending. > However, until recently, emacs did not do this. > > This adds a (known broken) test for this when sending messages in > emacs. We will backport the fix to notmuch-emacs in the next > changeset. I should have thought about this sooner, but this test is actually a bit fragile. If the folding width changes for some reason in emacs, then the test will break. I guess it's a corner case that we can live with.