From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B08E6DE0F5C for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 05:49:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.05 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.05 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.049, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xrZQ_kk0g2to for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 05:49:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B43F6DE0ED6 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 05:49:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hbPAP-00085d-3F; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 08:49:21 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 1372 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 12:49:19 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Dmitry M , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: HTML email in notmuch-el. In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 09:49:19 -0300 Message-ID: <878su5wsz4.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 12:49:23 -0000 Dmitry M writes: > I have the following questions: > 1. Is there any documentation on how to improve notmuch-el's HTML > rendering? Partciularly around rendering various [miltipart/*] messages > inline and preserving some of the original layout? I guess you're thinking about customization / configuration? I don't know of anything other than mm-text-html-renderer. > 2. Is there a way to integrate mu4e-view with notmuch? I suppose the rendering code from mu4e-view could be borrowed and modified, but I'm not familiar with that codebase at all. A quick look shows mu4e seems to default to mu4e-shr2text to do the actual HTML rendering. So whatever it is you like better is probably happening at a higher level than rendering the individual part.