From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id mPg/DPJdzWUHeAAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 01:42:26 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id mPg/DPJdzWUHeAAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 01:42:26 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org designates 135.181.149.255 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1707957746; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-owner:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=VIom+6r7saHiLOX55MhIS+2WNf3CFgwRI1A8mDliUoA=; b=a3oEzzGXF9Mo2hDVmFUQ8PFRppxIe0PoUqABwr2elYBwi0y3Q4DsV6YK1I+YcybkECAMpo YVN0wnWZHKe0iTVFBgJO82+TTrhRdPpndOmKatP+ftyta/Bh27AF4v43gjio3jP4Zwii3t Yvz5ddxuDjlRSryv+J/MLRc6Q4bQxHJp+vjjeCL34KtDtiTqfzmMQHggCRqr6VuIA4I5IO Lm1ps59yTG1SHGIzUG7BMhArbgbe25MkschnWVMgqGJY3xcLjQoT+tWEsky3+JcGpNNA9T g9RDi5f+PGBIvE6WQYPdXn1ZaazNougVJMQ7HoRQsVG4JshGfaAhm6Yw+a3W/Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org designates 135.181.149.255 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1707957746; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Ks0O3XXrHBCr268u+e3MoxOfu+pcs4GruxYigh48zgHE/xfeGhXjHhn5FAJpkRGVPLo3pt DjJMmOvN5uMzqY5/SvCEuDsy5sGX3tKUoStgWINcaveVTeS4P8GHGzowfJvYiPuCzqN6jP HBZYrs9mTvCzXxvmwIp2VLBis9ojJFIZyoZu16Xw6B8P5KHZFm+/9bWXEtFa/h0Zq0NR/t 1ZZSaDx1V15392BM13F9Ul1x0Km76mwN8pL2zp7KFWLN71hUemmeRCjLtp+Zn2K52STnND KoGDXzSIj8OfYtfjPjMgA0VXVfoqq+JCkyhQNS7ZGPVhPshUevPEF/WFYkcu3Q== Received: from mail.notmuchmail.org (yantan.tethera.net [135.181.149.255]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0E3B233C8 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 01:42:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.notmuchmail.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC3E5F82D; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:42:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phubs.tethera.net (phubs.tethera.net [192.99.9.157]) by mail.notmuchmail.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2395B5F7D1 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:42:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tethera.net (fctnnbsc51w-156-57-35-156.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net [156.57.35.156]) by phubs.tethera.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50BA8180066; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 20:42:18 -0400 (AST) Received: (nullmailer pid 805170 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:42:17 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Ralph Seichter , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Individual tag file lines and removing all tags? In-Reply-To: <877cj67p4o.fsf@ra.horus-it.com> References: <87wmrb8as8.fsf@ra.horus-it.com> <87plx1xnh1.fsf@tethera.net> <878r3p5hlb.fsf@ra.horus-it.com> <8734tvvy5e.fsf@tethera.net> <877cj67p4o.fsf@ra.horus-it.com> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 20:42:17 -0400 Message-ID: <878r3my2vq.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID-Hash: 43GX4KEOLQYEIRU2B7JB6VZNRYTBBICE X-Message-ID-Hash: 43GX4KEOLQYEIRU2B7JB6VZNRYTBBICE X-MailFrom: david@tethera.net X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-notmuch.notmuchmail.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.3 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Country: DE X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 1.26 X-Spam-Score: 1.26 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: D0E3B233C8 X-TUID: DOdKuWrr2mPF Ralph Seichter writes: > > notmuch-tag(1) states that batch tagging operations are "more efficient > than repeated notmuch tag invocations" (this is not qualified further). > I don't know if the efficiency advantage of batch tagging would justify > the time/effort required to implement the feature? > My assumption is that the overhead of multiple invocations is only noticible for (at a guess) 1000s of calls to notmuch-tag. For two or three it probably doesn't make much difference. batch-tag is really just saving the cost of exec as far as I remember. d