From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2D3431FD6 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 04:00:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U4fDwBpFJTLC for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 04:00:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6783F431FD5 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 04:00:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VS374-0005il-R7 for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 13:00:02 +0200 Received: from dslb-178-012-219-036.pools.arcor-ip.net ([178.12.219.36]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 13:00:02 +0200 Received: from coroa by dslb-178-012-219-036.pools.arcor-ip.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 13:00:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org From: coroa@online.de (Jonas =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B6rsch?=) Subject: Re: Emacs: how to remove "unread" tag while reading emails Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 12:51:06 +0200 Message-ID: <877gdtia1x.fsf@kafka.loc> References: <87hadi0xse.fsf@boo.workgroup> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dslb-178-012-219-036.pools.arcor-ip.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ih42riwYq9FRdY47m4M506dUN+g= X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 11:00:14 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 18 2013, Gregor Zattler wrote: > This seems strange to me. I would say the unread tag should be > removed when leaving the message with the last press on space > bar, indicating that one really paged trough the whole message > instead of only seeing the very beginning of it. > > What=E2=80=99s the rationale to this behaviour? Am I missing something?= =20=20 oftentimes, i start reading my mails from a search on the unread tag and just quickly enter a message with RET and leave it again pressing q. with the above suggestion the message would stay marked as unread, although i saw it. extra commands like S-SPC and S-a, to bury the buffer after skimming through the last message in the open thread would remedy the situation then, though. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSTp2aAAoJECrXDlJwTJyR7cMQAM1OcYr4ydaOEGtuOZP2tBMW QPOi6hKkQkOX4ISPPJieqEFpPHn36tl2Zs5oUL57dbv7EC5mNF6FXRjORFZ8m8q2 tvfiYgfUm/hBTpXEJzaOgBMfiOYPK104ykfAe4JIHtWCs/3BKhFius84x1+FQLZy H04Est+OF9IL/fE5BgmLU5NvgcU+mlfOQN804b0biIfXo2R1wTWCpaa0YA4bin7f xktniDjCNc8s+j4T9DJqYswGaIL0U+Xq/UEY3AG29/iiVQpIXX+JH1bOK3Fm52aA 3ABBdZWleeziKEwIL9fwITI9oj8esuR+EbmUt33cbjkzSMkii8s7wESts2S/mC6Z JtO5a+JeyKQTIb86Fyra5tAQvKb0p8HLvr3FBBT9d6L0JlNdNhXBTH3Sx1XBdDgF bCUycMno6NkX0eXRjkp+NVZfF+qHArQiwczeS8SWukLK/PxgWRr1bM+CJ1/hqWEx 86i7quEQqpcM8V5btS7q4loUhzBi2oR32Gt6V0uqjKGrF70fbygVkfGSYAzczg1O chJKGgiuKVgwqZjFEvOR61YKySKvT6l0PNU3LrD9w2Cr8KKiuUD2l6Ph/kXm0e8a bkngMj87glYFEtslLhbJHuL/juObCNXnRa9kgpDPQmKC6Syr+UZZDrDZpUy5X36W foAFzNg1jLdMO2ccx71K =DxYy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--