From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06C16DE0F7F for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2019 16:40:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.051 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.051 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.050, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V64fgTmuSznX for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2019 16:40:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41BCD6DE0EEA for ; Sat, 27 Jul 2019 16:40:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hrWIm-0001EV-2L; Sat, 27 Jul 2019 19:40:36 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 32699 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 24 Jul 2019 21:05:37 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Teemu Likonen , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Emacs: UI problems with messages excluded by several tags In-Reply-To: <877e8edwkc.fsf@iki.fi> References: <87ftn31r9h.fsf@iki.fi> <87h87ip67y.fsf@tethera.net> <877e8edwkc.fsf@iki.fi> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 18:05:37 -0300 Message-ID: <877e87rvmm.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 23:40:38 -0000 Teemu Likonen writes: > > Let's test: > > $ notmuch config set search.exclude_tags exclude-1 exclude-2 > > Now add "exclude-1" tag for some message and it will show in "All tags" > section with count 1. > > All tags: [hide] > > 1 exclude-1 > > Now add also "exclude-2" tag for the same massage and see the "All tags" > section again. > > All tags: [hide] > > [neither exclude-1 nor exclude-2 here] > Right, I understand now thanks, and I agree there's a bug or missing feature there. d