From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 4Cx3CESn2l5BTgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 20:12:52 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id eDVSBESn2l7cfgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 20:12:52 +0000 Received: from arlo.cworth.org (arlo.cworth.org [50.126.95.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A6F49404CF for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 20:12:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FDA76DE1383; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:12:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1o0oXgeEXO1o; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:12:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arlo.cworth.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 109F26DE09CD; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:12:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 825F76DE09CD for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:12:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 90PDsE_DEhy9 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:12:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ej1-f68.google.com (mail-ej1-f68.google.com [209.85.218.68]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 675CC6DE0943 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:12:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-f68.google.com with SMTP id f7so11440553ejq.6 for ; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 13:12:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=W3VrYjopEkZEuv3GNLgsszSmuwvsUl/tdk8l9rAXeIs=; b=ftcOcuVFk0nr/cQpAqw5DlcLAuOEev4dUNuQxPE2O82fHPR8cOeG3VBgG9KTZP6xno RtikHCyI4g1/iG4axGyzL4ZYeuAdMlv3LB2g/HnKXBiI1VKZwixa5di7eDEOMx5emNGu EbFeqtZ6AfB8UKgVD7uOIY5K57XICVi9NHv75sQOHt/par+HJ7jXVHVUGvlWl8evql0n BXNRyZOGLNdqc5NggSKO5AG646juHZVWJbIRUgSHHEjtOzMVWbJdEsA7Qk81zE3YgeQT 94d23QsB+sJEZB2lIym4fJbQnaqoMgYYlAoPreSs6kLx6O8iXsaoVZbM1SpkJBFwZq7S sq+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:mime-version; bh=W3VrYjopEkZEuv3GNLgsszSmuwvsUl/tdk8l9rAXeIs=; b=HpZOhk7JvaZUNfr20/4S+roH1JShEkH2GmUDI+4QBb4sPdYpAJF0l75uk0saXNRaXC 58mOtBP+btHScPJBVYXK13WeKDYxyVK3FXk5zRtZFfS1wt9gYPGtH36skF+mt45NoRSX W592SRNOb6VGSJ4XXSMH6rwtGOiHZzrL21oqNwSupEOYvQwuHJTM6nYvdqiZfjN7Y+na bMuC/sPjJIdu+jFDYSjaujSpzpdMP2GEcsrTljvPGyJ7+SQc11wiBGp2IeAb4Ee72d6J zYm0qMub1kSaHEfJSzC3eoU/Cyl2zwHGtcCifXHU17ICuj9FpJ7bOE1fNnfRIQEHk1n1 rQvw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533uTTy1sW1N4HXbhnSI0gyZUzmYqNyf26PybZmXcFFLErUvxWog 3Kz4eROy4WsjyCydhq1isjg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwoq3oqtPSsIpK2UlcHQfP3dZnxjvHXYbEIOKBakXdaWv/E1Md9sNKhoyoshkPZthOVJ+6FUQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d215:: with SMTP id w21mr10064311ejz.383.1591387958469; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 13:12:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from powell.devork.be (2a02-8388-8480-1180-4c18-fc69-8d8c-22b5.cable.dynamic.v6.surfer.at. [2a02:8388:8480:1180:4c18:fc69:8d8c:22b5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j11sm5088512ejk.67.2020.06.05.13.12.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 05 Jun 2020 13:12:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 207738 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 05 Jun 2020 20:12:36 -0000 From: Floris Bruynooghe To: Tomi Ollila , David Bremner , Ralph Seichter , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Python 3.x bindings support which versions, exactly? In-Reply-To: References: <874ks5kvwu.fsf@wedjat.horus-it.com> <871rn95dys.fsf@tethera.net> <874ks3wvu1.fsf@powell.devork.be> Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 22:12:36 +0200 Message-ID: <877dwl6zm3.fsf@powell.devork.be> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org Sender: "notmuch" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (body hash did not verify) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ftcOcuVF; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org designates 50.126.95.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org X-Spam-Score: 0.99 X-TUID: nT58S+pqlt3v On Tue 26 May 2020 at 00:41 +0300, Tomi Ollila wrote: > On Mon, May 25 2020, Floris Bruynooghe wrote: > >> In tox.ini the earliest version is 3.5 and if memory serves me right >> there's a reasonably good reason for that. I think the notmuch2 >> bindings use some features not yet present in 3.4. But anything >= 3.5 >> should be supported and if not a bug. I guess tox.ini should be updated >> with 3.8 sometime :) > > I've been long thinking whether our current python3 check is "strict" > enough, as it, in configure, is: > > if "$python" -c 'import sys; assert sys.version_info >= (3,0)' > /dev/null 2>&1 > > Perhaps that should be updated to (3,5) ? If this check is only used to decide to build the python-cffi/notmuch2 bindings, then yes.