From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <five9a2@gmail.com>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229E1431FBF
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:54:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id OFK+uisBHsgR for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:54:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-f200.google.com (mail-yw0-f200.google.com
	[209.85.211.200])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B746B431FAE
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:54:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ywh38 with SMTP id 38so4273942ywh.6
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:54:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:from:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;
	bh=yIskciFehAFrnP86KSNHx3G0Pkfdjw+7r18QJnEco+Q=;
	b=q6gKh8a8EL0bXQ903QGz9jHglv/UCMy0TMpxLqc6ejdnEB7Yh2ksHwt/93rZxZyTwD
	t1OBtxHdiFlUwmWLXczNOIRy8BgFNYn5YMUDbd82/WechzcAGjWrpWVb5dwPOZ6NhdC+
	8ExtXPVuJC9bGse2nYlXufxC/GtWTyA90Bm2E=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
	:mime-version:content-type;
	b=KvnIxnD+ryIkP66nIi9jbD+Sm5mjxZE5td4hUCGK/DdLIxRb7+DZDnGd2cZuaixD3e
	eyHdAore9VfQmt9c6I5/KBl0Mwg8Eoo7p0lTN2rBlZ7RREF7cWCFDYZH+5nf3m7aJIU+
	4GVO/sUEfPEGPmPXuar9hZHchnNU9+ngTAwkI=
Received: by 10.150.71.31 with SMTP id t31mr8102948yba.18.1261220057079;
	Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:54:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kunyang ([216.38.153.2])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm2876647iwn.13.2009.12.19.02.54.13
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
	Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:54:16 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Jed Brown <five9a2@gmail.com>
From: Jed Brown <jed@59A2.org>
To: Alex Ghitza <aghitza@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
In-Reply-To: <54hbrnpod1.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <54hbrnpod1.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:55:16 -0800
Message-ID: <8763836xnv.fsf@59A2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: keeping a copy of sent mail locally
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:54:21 -0000

On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:41:14 +1100, Alex Ghitza <aghitza@gmail.com> wrote:
> Bcc-ing myself on every sent message is suboptimal for a number of
> reasons: (1) gmail throws away the bcc-ed copy since it has the same
> message id as the one sitting in the gmail sent mail, and so the
> bcc-ed copy never makes it back to my local mail;

I agree it is suboptimal, but are you sure this is true?  I send
messages via gmail and those having Bcc to me are marked as new and
downloaded by the next pass of getmail (via POP).

Jed