From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0514A429E21 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:15:52 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mi2BG5oV2rXE for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:15:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26CA1431FB6 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:15:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from zancas.localnet (fctnnbsc36w-156034076032.pppoe-dynamic.High-Speed.nb.bellaliant.net [156.34.76.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0C0FiWu025863 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:15:45 -0400 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Rl8KW-00010T-Bb; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:15:44 -0400 From: David Bremner To: Tomi Ollila , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: where to put uncrustify... (was: Re: ) In-Reply-To: References: <1324135695-15487-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> <1326197228-10356-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11~rc3 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:15:44 -0400 Message-ID: <8762gh93nz.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:15:52 -0000 On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:03:14 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:07:06 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > > The usual problem: suitable names. HACKING sounds to me like > "Are you doing some serious work or just HACKING..." but I could > not find anything better either. > > Any other thoughts ? doc-devel, devel-doc, maint-doc, coding-docs? d