From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 209FE431FAF for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 13:35:57 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sO-W+gJdCnIm for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 13:35:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com (mail-lb0-f181.google.com [209.85.217.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72D4A431FAE for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 13:35:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id ge1so778468lbb.26 for ; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 13:35:55 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=WNg8/Quy16ju7hpXmTE1fGhYh+bq/CZgIcOg8epiVqE=; b=PNfIoiSrx2REZGWdEUnxEIRcrn3+G59jfx9eAGpFqXaLRSo6Z45G0pWdbQetdxF7A5 bSNjLUdBaFwzq2vBMEU6EbmkyKyfJpon+axxJF2WzEv9tBfFfGUzL4VfErVP12B6OE5f WZgiA/jKbt0pJpXqqmYgpnpoEY3aShSpX+eGBeBVto2T2Umc6g+qEJsa0w3Yqpu/SyJ3 u/yH0waPL98sE7g9wh429hk7tMUIbeiSRJ9MbHgE1cNjtckupom27A6wMG6CHh5pSIir FVopSIXtW1yiZ9fDNJh0w/rPT2ymXvXfhLWUIzuOIL+v+hfoSC0pG+npOy5mJBQV5kN7 XU8Q== Received: by 10.112.87.104 with SMTP id w8mr3143881lbz.49.1354916154948; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 13:35:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw4-fe51df00-27.dhcp.inet.fi. [80.223.81.27]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v7sm4003338lbj.13.2012.12.07.13.35.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 07 Dec 2012 13:35:54 -0800 (PST) From: Jani Nikula To: Jameson Graef Rollins , David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] TODO: date range queries - check In-Reply-To: <877gothkzw.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> References: <1354833276-6219-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org> <877gouine4.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <871uf2ukat.fsf@zancas.localnet> <877gothkzw.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+138~g7041c56 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 23:35:51 +0200 Message-ID: <87624dzgso.fsf@nikula.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnGRHKpPVf+yia6L6pu4RASPmnudVGOFH5H8KfjiOLKbID5j0pAusq4KQDj61gdo2+q+0YA X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:35:57 -0000 On Fri, 07 Dec 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07 2012, David Bremner wrote: >> Jameson Graef Rollins writes: >>> Has this TODO really been resolved? Do searches like "since:2009-01-1" >>> or "until:2009-01-1" really now work? As far as I can tell they don't. >>> Nor are they documented if they do. >> >> For specifying one-ended ranges, I find the current syntax OK-ish. It >> would be reasonable to formulate a seperate TODO for supporting >> things like date:2012-12-07 > > Yeah, I think this is reasonable. I still think it would be nice to > have the requested functionality. I'm probably having a visceral > reaction to the fact that I initially thought the new parser *did* > support these kinds of searches, and was really confused when I got > errors. Austin's custom query parser from way back did support this, so > it is possible. It doesn't hurt anything to continue to list it as a > desired feature. Fine by me. I was just trying to clean up the file a bit, that's all. The only downside I can think of is potential new users stumbling on this and thinking we still don't have date queries. *shrug*. BR, Jani.