From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA8E431FD9 for ; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 15:57:21 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N0t0IfWhwT1K for ; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 15:57:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91586431FCF for ; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 15:57:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WHiv5-0000Uf-V5; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:57:15 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 19261 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 23 Feb 2014 23:57:11 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Tomi Ollila , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [RFC Patch v3 2/3] doc: add target rst2man to build man pages using rst2man In-Reply-To: References: <87fvo7btu8.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <1393114575-8756-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> <1393114575-8756-3-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:57:11 -0400 Message-ID: <8761o5z8ko.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 23:57:21 -0000 Tomi Ollila writes: > Anyway, I tried to build manual pages using 'make man' and got this: > > $ make man > sphinx-build -b man -d doc/_build/doctrees -q -c doc doc doc/_build/man > Sphinx error: > Builder name man not registered It seems you need sphinx version 1.0, from July 2010 for the man builder. > No fallback to use rst2man... I don't really plan on an automatic fallback. There is currently a separate target rst2man. I'm open to better names for the targets. > Comments regarding prerst2man.py inline below: Yeah, I'm sure there's lots that could be improved with that script. But I'll wait until I see if the general approach is acceptable. d