From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D276DE143A
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  4 Dec 2015 04:07:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.325
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.325 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.226, 
 RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.55, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled
Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id E8lm72Fybk8v for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
 Fri,  4 Dec 2015 04:07:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197])
 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F57E6DE1413
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri,  4 Dec 2015 04:07:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84)
 (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)
 id 1a4p8w-00079S-65; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 07:07:18 -0500
Received: (nullmailer pid 6172 invoked by uid 1000);
 Fri, 04 Dec 2015 12:07:19 -0000
From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
To: Damien Cassou <damien@cassou.me>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: notmuch-reply doesn't use Reply-To
In-Reply-To: <8737vjcx9b.fsf@cassou.me>
References: <8737vjcx9b.fsf@cassou.me>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+7~g55fb7da (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1
 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 08:07:19 -0400
Message-ID: <87610e8ljc.fsf@zancas.localnet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 12:07:26 -0000

Damien Cassou <damien@cassou.me> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I've the impression that notmuch-reply doesn't respect the Reply-To
> field: I've an email with a Reply-To field. But when I execute "notmuch
> reply id:<msg-id>", the To: field is set to the From: field of the
> original email and not to the Reply-To: field.
>

Hmm. The following test suggests it doesn't ignore reply-to completely.
Maybe there is some side-effect from --reply-to=sender. What if you try
omitting that?

test_begin_subtest "Support for Reply-To"
add_message '[from]="Sender <sender@example.com>"' \
	     [to]=test_suite@notmuchmail.org \
	     [subject]=notmuch-reply-test \
	    '[date]="Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:43:56 -0000"' \
	    '[body]="support for reply-to"' \
	    '[reply-to]="Sender <elsewhere@example.com>"'

output=$(notmuch reply id:${gen_msg_id})
test_expect_equal "$output" "From: Notmuch Test Suite <test_suite@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: notmuch-reply-test
To: Sender <elsewhere@example.com>
In-Reply-To: <${gen_msg_id}>
References: <${gen_msg_id}>

On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:43:56 -0000, Sender <sender@example.com> wrote:
> support for reply-to"