From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C4E6DE0BB8 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 07:30:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.127 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.127 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.137, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52d-9u5Zzkja for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 07:30:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [162.247.75.118]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B9566DE0B2F for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 07:30:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fifthhorseman.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:60d:f004:72ff:fecc:fda9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D5F3F99B; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 10:30:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D369D20338; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 10:15:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor To: David Bremner , debian mipsel buildd maintainers , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: build failures on mipsel In-Reply-To: <87d0x6osty.fsf@tethera.net> References: <87wove9q35.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <87d0x6osty.fsf@tethera.net> Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 10:15:05 -0400 Message-ID: <87602w9f2u.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 14:30:24 -0000 On Mon 2018-06-04 23:44:25 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > $ make test-binaries && ./T357-index-decryption.sh > > That works for me on eller, so there must be some difference between the > two environments (buildd versus porterbox) what schroot are you working from on eller? i wonder what the difference is between your schroot and mine, because mine fails with the same emacs problem that tomi identified. --dkg