From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB8F6DE0ECA for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 05:58:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.022 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.022 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.021, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y_CQvbtFYDHn for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 05:58:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 694106DE0C66 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 05:58:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hBfTZ-0006OD-T1; Wed, 03 Apr 2019 08:58:45 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 7274 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 03 Apr 2019 12:58:44 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Leo Vivier , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] emacs: Implement notmuch-search-refine In-Reply-To: <87v9zvgv2y.fsf@hidden> References: <87wombliew.fsf@hidden> <87r2aje6e7.fsf@tethera.net> <87v9zvgv2y.fsf@hidden> Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 09:58:44 -0300 Message-ID: <875zrv8cu3.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 12:58:48 -0000 Leo Vivier writes: > Discovering that severely undermined the raison d=E2=80=99=C3=AAtre of th= is patch. I > tried to do something else with it by having it mimic a similar function > in mu4e where the point was put at the end of the previous search, but > I=E2=80=99ve found very little use for it. > > I think it=E2=80=99s safe to abandon this patch. > Thanks for the followup. I'll mark it as obsolete for now. All the best, David