From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B3F431FD0 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:16:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H-4pJ5Pyott3 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:16:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFA84431FB6 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:16:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zancas.localnet (fctnnbsc36w-156034064058.pppoe-dynamic.High-Speed.nb.bellaliant.net [156.34.64.58]) (authenticated bits=0) by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9PNGKhP018152 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 25 Oct 2011 20:16:21 -0300 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RIqEF-0007Cx-NH; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 20:16:19 -0300 From: David Bremner To: Daniel Schoepe , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Patch review/application process In-Reply-To: <878vo8kdl2.fsf@gilead.invalid> References: <878vo8kdl2.fsf@gilead.invalid> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 20:16:19 -0300 Message-ID: <874nyw8xx8.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 23:16:29 -0000 On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:42:33 +0200, Daniel Schoepe wrote: > A mechanism to share notmuch tags between users could probably also be > adapted for this purpose, but this would make it harder for > non-notmuch users to discuss issues / see existing with the same > comfort. (Package maintainers or people who want to check what > outstanding flaws exist before migrating to notmuch come to mind). FWIW, I'm currently working on such a mechanism, and it should be done before _too_ long. d