From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676E96DE12E8
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 05:06:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.036
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.036 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[AWL=-0.025, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01]
 autolearn=disabled
Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id iSJDiLLsQ41I for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
 Sat, 27 Feb 2016 05:06:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197])
 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 437166DE0C3A
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 05:06:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84)
 (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)
 id 1aZeaX-0006eL-Oa; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 08:07:13 -0500
Received: (nullmailer pid 3306 invoked by uid 1000);
 Sat, 27 Feb 2016 13:06:32 -0000
From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>,
 Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/16] create a notmuch_indexopts_t index options
 object
In-Reply-To: <1454272801-23623-8-git-send-email-dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
References: <1454272801-23623-1-git-send-email-dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
 <1454272801-23623-8-git-send-email-dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+26~g9404723 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1
 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:06:32 -0400
Message-ID: <874mcu5mlj.fsf@zancas.localnet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 13:06:37 -0000

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> writes:

> +
> +notmuch_indexopts_t *
> +notmuch_indexopts_create ()
> +{
> +    notmuch_indexopts_t *ret;
> +    
> +    ret = talloc_zero (NULL, notmuch_indexopts_t);
> +
> +    return ret;
> +}

I have the same question about using talloc with a NULL context. It
_looks_ like there is no actual benefit here?

d