From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05BD86DE0C19 for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 05:13:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.007 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.007 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VMenQuG5C8fx for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 05:13:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A5DA6DE0BFA for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 05:13:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1blaxz-00075g-To; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 08:13:03 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 32720 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 18 Sep 2016 12:13:10 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Mark Walters , Ioan-Adrian Ratiu , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: add tag jump menu In-Reply-To: <8737kxbmnx.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> References: <1474146583-28476-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> <87h99dg0af.fsf@adiPC.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <8737kxbmnx.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 09:13:10 -0300 Message-ID: <874m5dv221.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 12:13:19 -0000 Mark Walters writes: > I agree that C-u is a little cumbersome -- I think I would be happy for > a toggle for single messages (with a single tag change), but for > multiple messages like a thread I think it would be very unclear what it > was doing. It's also not clear how toggle works for multiple tags. I mean, it's clear in a mathematical sense, but not so clear when it would be expected and useful in a UI sense. > > It would be plausible to modify my patch so that k u does the same as > Ctrl-u k (i.e. takes you to the reverse tag operations) which would > avoid the awkward ctrl-u. (I don't want to add another key to the top > level maps as we are really very short on free keys) A third option would be to use M-k as a synonym for C-u k