From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jb55@jb55.com>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B836DE01EC
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 07:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.012
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.098, 
 DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled
Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id YoDe4I6-T0Ux for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
 Mon, 23 Jul 2018 07:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jb55.com (jb55.com [45.79.91.128])
 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3817B6DE00EF
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 07:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d= jb55.com;
 h=from:to:subject:date:message-id; s=default;
 bh=up00C2jfLwL1ffhKSgAp5mSa3w0iozI73kOkJT6Vrm4=;
 b=PBJGDvwo1VvgK9JzL5xfYGfUnkOcL2IXCxi0C1x7gkpR9ZxbhGb0ooUmq68omoiYvLxI0qdd2dB4cKfrCn9F55wLMknC39Yxq6lNW/T9RkIqN789qHoMZhnS+tQXt3U+IN547YN08FS386yU56QW4sXXaYMsgyuEya9sRG1dZzHuZy09K3OzC64FFyWHxVmMX3a43fYV5pWQ8W1kNtPWgd/PG6UnxsHk4jBxqPBIP7WqCEqv//5TEYo/hC6SYq7wMc8XuMkkWKasyk0zX67ynzLwuGoaiJjIqFanmZVXJeKJ+CKEwboyedYwBc/anfigaW7+GiCFP3gij3vVaMe1xA==
Received: from jb55.com (S010660e327dca171.vc.shawcable.net [24.84.152.187])
 by jb55.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 7e6d62e7
 TLS version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO; 
 Mon, 23 Jul 2018 14:46:51 +0000 (UTC)
From: William Casarin <jb55@jb55.com>
To: Leonard Lausen <leonard@lausen.nl>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: Sorting & grouping
In-Reply-To: <87muuk6yma.fsf@lausen.nl>
References: <87muuk6yma.fsf@lausen.nl>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 07:46:50 -0700
Message-ID: <874lgqypph.fsf@jb55.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 14:46:54 -0000

Leonard Lausen <leonard@lausen.nl> writes:

> What do you think about adding a 'group' option that will group mails
> with the same set of tags (possibly minus a list of tags to be ignored
> when grouping) and apply the normal search.

Hmm. I think could be simplified by sorting by a specific tag, and then
by date, etc

Once sorted by a tag, grouping could be a UI thing. Clients would be
able to create visual groupings once they know what tag they are sorting on.

Cheers,
Will