From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B21B6DE0F46 for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 02:11:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.061 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.061 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.060, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dvK6JBC13HR7 for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 02:11:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.eurecom.fr (smtp.eurecom.fr [193.55.113.210]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F836DE0F3B for ; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 02:11:24 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,324,1549926000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="9864978" Received: from waha.eurecom.fr (HELO smtps.eurecom.fr) ([10.3.2.236]) by drago1i.eurecom.fr with ESMTP; 08 Apr 2019 11:11:22 +0200 Received: from archibald (unknown [193.55.114.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtps.eurecom.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60183852; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:11:22 +0200 (CEST) From: Sebastian Poeplau To: David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: notmuch-tag-jump for multiple threads In-Reply-To: <87r2agarkt.fsf@tethera.net> References: <87d0m31eip.fsf@eurecom.fr> <87r2agarkt.fsf@tethera.net> Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 11:11:19 +0200 Message-ID: <874l78g8ug.fsf@eurecom.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 09:11:26 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > On a semi-related note I sometimes miss the > ability to mark a set of non-contiguous threads / messages for action > (like 'm' in dired).=20 That would probably the most general way to go. Then one could also build the equivalent of dired's '% m' and '% g' to mark based on some sort of query. However, it would require reconsidering all existing commands in the context of marks, wouldn't it? For example, what would happen if I pressed 'RET' in the search view while multiple threads are marked? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEETinj16c+X+EXu7K2u/wmSK+r4l8FAlyrEDcACgkQu/wmSK+r 4l+ffAf5AexWzYEwxygsQ+GpDkgbTJrTueFVtRiaTlqAWGJAd0BXnI8dCF/RqbCw LfyjCXtk4Y3uf8rGtABhaQ6GA5asYpUF7o8RwpPRYg+vRnvyzCtOQD6FjzCwZw+Z o2MUBfe/pmMAj71Y39aBPUrfu/NLoZUzymJVprNCW/6mtZQDbNOcyxS2/P1YrQYl EscZurns8GBzmFimd7ef2qSCSsSL9VSf/DyZWNfkEj4LWnwuUPUVjjYPxKeS1loP GW+mF/kwQLM8GNfvyvZ67QokoM9KQltPIp3mdT4IaUs8wR/4fOlWu/jlO10+wSvs ki+NanIdUvYX4tFNLPqzLuJB+7u/gw== =TJAv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--