From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38541431FBC for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:58:01 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xCqWBGFUGTXt for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:58:00 -0800 (PST) X-Greylist: delayed 391 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at olra; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:58:00 PST Received: from picnicpark.org (picnicpark.org [130.94.181.238]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739C6431FAE for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:58:00 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 59002 invoked by uid 13806); 27 Nov 2009 16:51:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gw.picnicpark.org) ([76.210.240.177]) (envelope-sender ) by 130.94.181.238 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Nov 2009 16:51:19 -0000 Received: from friend.picnicpark.org.picnicpark.org (friend.picnicpark.org [192.168.35.1]) by gw.picnicpark.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E050550094 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:51:19 -0800 (PST) Resent-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Resent-From: Keith Amidon Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:51:18 -0800 Resent-Message-ID: <87zl67sygp.fsf@friend.picnicpark.org> From: Keith Amidon To: aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Aneesh Kumar K.V) Organization: picnicpark.org References: <1259328615-1445-1-git-send-email-camalot@picnicpark.org> <1259328615-1445-2-git-send-email-camalot@picnicpark.org> <1259328615-1445-3-git-send-email-camalot@picnicpark.org> <1259328615-1445-4-git-send-email-camalot@picnicpark.org> <1259328615-1445-5-git-send-email-camalot@picnicpark.org> <1259328615-1445-6-git-send-email-camalot@picnicpark.org> <1259328615-1445-7-git-send-email-camalot@picnicpark.org> <87bpiongh5.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:48:56 -0800 In-Reply-To: <87bpiongh5.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (Aneesh Kumar K. V.'s message of "Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:48:46 +0530") Message-ID: <873a3zud53.fsf@friend.picnicpark.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] Reply to individual messages using message library X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:58:01 -0000 {-- Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:48:46 +0530: Aneesh wrote: --} Aneesh> Hi, Really good set of patches. I am right now testing with Aneesh> the set of changes and found that Thanks! Aneesh> a) notmuch-show-reply-current and other helpers doesn't put Aneesh> the mail content i am replying in the reply buffer in quoted Aneesh> form. What i was expecting was something similar to Aneesh> notmuch-show-reply but one that doesn't add all the email Aneesh> address. Well, the fact that I mainly cared about message forwarding and not the reply functions is turning out to show rather badly... There appear to be a number of problems with the reply functions starting with the fact that I kill the buffer that has the original message contents in it as soon as the reply buffer is constructed, which message doesn't really like. I can think of some ways around the problems but I'm getting the sense that enhancing the notmuch C program's ability to generate different styles of replies would be preferred to what I have done. Forwarding works fine though... :-) Aneesh> b) The key-binding MA is really difficult to type. How about Aneesh> (kbd "M-a") ? c) I liked the mail forward feature My main criteria in selecting key bindings was that they not conflict with current ones. If this were to become the preferred way to do this I'd be happy to change them to whatever consensus emerges. --- Keith