From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6729D4196F2 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:03:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.89 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7HnXLSlPiqIM for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:03:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tarap.cc.columbia.edu (tarap.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.7]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A71B5431FC1 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:03:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from servo.finestructure.net (geco.phys.columbia.edu [128.59.170.159]) (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0) by tarap.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o3CI3veh028349 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:03:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O1NzI-0002nr-Jt; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:03:56 -0400 From: Jameson Rollins To: Anthony Towns , notmuch Subject: Re: [PATCH] notmuch new --new-tags=tags... In-Reply-To: References: <871velp0be.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87y6gseval.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87633wbt9f.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> <87ljcsekc4.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:03:52 -0400 Message-ID: <8739z0eeev.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-No-Spam-Score: Local X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.7 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:03:59 -0000 --=-=-= On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 03:15:28 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > If you say "they're just notmuch tag commands applied at new time" you > expect to have the same search behaviour as Xapian... True, but that's not exactly what I was saying. I was just saying to use the same syntax. But I expect that things might have to work differently under the hood. But it might be too much work to come up with something to parse the search syntax and apply the tag accordingly. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLw2CIAAoJEO00zqvie6q8wm4P/Azp2v3pjDO8mhMt0f/9Itzm oi26KCRhtkzofYzj6/x8LI8haTU2Sm8QA1aQpBQhCWIu8W4SJPgzmslxMkiDv43I shgSGvKV/bnoXLXCSjIAME+lrO7tPlM2CYlOVdwVYspJO19G0Bb57WrN3668v9AD urRR0KMC7h1aBMmRbdDzyapp6YExNIYebCRVOIqtFQn4YrSKt4hhg7f1+1KbQDtA lgzxNpUP5JVmt+ozDK5PhQQu0acMcpCs415rgMe56V9KdjibtTRv167YK73R+D3I uDJCT3kpwDFR6hhC11vcsAsLhBjSF/ts4Dc/WqLbEI6LrYjnNXfzw0QHcek0WCN4 CCyEk/FoFrRVxOBS9jlJpKDuFiZJDlnWB6WWDPAsAo0z3B1p/n0sYk79Bg1pPU3k gfiBZslWc/G2PDuRILF5u6V5gaYyXXHtJjU7CBDLeYMbSQJLiqyEqXXAl/IoUN5j KoUoiLoTPT1T7WOndPnBDu9mNT7VKtv3u+GXLJYQr9vALN2NfiG+UnuuHvC+K1OG q5ShbG42BvDYe+ZQkWofEUTfcim9V7KI0H2jMZs1zrI2OgWRvSahaRJy9ZwrEuDe QKektd9lzXa4M6y7SNt/Mv8BZeMvq0nm2o9Z6MNr4FLpgXXODPbH8C6z7ciVsZ/4 4+ncCwRnDQ3mfyGy1vt3 =qAci -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--