From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E99F431FB6 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:49:29 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WA+8qeeMkNIM for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:49:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from paneer.cc.columbia.edu (paneer.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.4]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE9A431FB5 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:49:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from servo.finestructure.net (gwave-107.ligo.caltech.edu [131.215.114.107]) (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@servo.finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0) by paneer.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p212nPpf027030 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:49:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PuFeP-0000Ku-FH; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:49:25 -0800 From: Jameson Rollins To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor , notmuch Subject: Re: [Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support In-Reply-To: <4D6C00C7.9000705@fifthhorseman.net> References: <4CF15D67.1070904@fifthhorseman.net> <87aak08fu8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87fwsf9mip.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87tygl29vu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87oc5yi9us.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87d3mdvjwz.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info> <87k4gk70ng.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87sjv8i7v6.fsf@irigaray.ross.mayfirst.org> <87sjv86mp9.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <4D6BF0AA.3070706@fifthhorseman.net> <874o7o6ih5.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <4D6C00C7.9000705@fifthhorseman.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-127-g598108c (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:49:19 -0800 Message-ID: <8739n75zdb.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-No-Spam-Score: Local X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.4 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 02:49:29 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 15:08:39 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > The outstanding question in my mind is whether those tags could be > mistaken by a na=C3=AFve user for meaning one of the other concepts. Is > there a way to name the tags to minimize that kind of confusion? I think that would be difficult without using a long and cumbersome tag name ("signed-but-not-verified"??). But I think it might be a bit of a moot point, since I kind of think that any user that actually understands what a signature is, and what signature verification means, is sophisticated enough to understand that the mere presence of a signature does not mean it's been verified. I could be wrong, though. If folks have suggestions for disambiguating tag names that don't themselves create further confusion on some other front, then I'm inclined to just go with the simplest and most straightforward tag name. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNbF6yAAoJEO00zqvie6q8/okQAIQXZgqN6ZS2clBC2+TlU1LS fWAd1jG2UAGEP+LMx4HfzLtVxZt/cM1blpUndqB9fz5YlkyUT001f6JfWJg5shzX OAFesV6WY8uUAZChv4nCgs7cekl8Na2z5qZnEEyHP6Pz5qazk8KTyfDimrYCNIA1 GbnFNI7R8HXnhv67uLBGymvJP8qkCV5TNr0F/2K+vziWYk368nZu+gnT5w72fh2+ QKfRIFO5UCbE0dV+Ee0AdS7tk21wgza8YPxNEJ+dF4nlaATiW9memQDuHAqUe8XD IjapbAOBIM99OO2y45JAtiltOK8quRsKK3CoTKDbw68AeCilbOIEPJsDnXC4+GRA lCMIvCsGA26rovwXEig6IjuoevT2O0EsAt6ODmXd+TnFlY1u9sICIweKP+gIKGzP tIP9Tv0LqzbOeTmrL71F58RF/eqtdvisVcYeCICzSLYVS4IjlOVLBgrE/MCo8P3h AarNnAiy4Deter0+QA26hkxxx+hLwaQYAspW0V0fRd6bfDH4joGwVaScT422aVk8 g+cRZnAUSQkAjoiv0XqbCv5nQjTsyYr7kThW4dghm5hF3B9L+4+nrrWovJxYcwid Rz9CiRSS4yYfoo3/gBaazPhdXbSpgHS6PZcc9tIa/slntfbWzThbUhCZV5KDf4jl LpzQNk/kx7jO+g/wo3LC =uGTY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--