Hi! On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 10:57:10 +0200, Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote: > Quoting Austin Clements (2013-06-23 18:59:39) > > Quoth Justus Winter on Jun 23 at 3:11 pm: > > > I recently had a problem replying to a mail written by Thomas Schwinge > > > using an oldish notmuch. Not sure if it has been fixed in more recent "Oldish", yeah, yeah, I know... (Mumbles someting about long TODO list.) > > > versions, but I think notmuch could improve uppon its header > > > generation (see below). Problematic part of the mail: > > > > > > ~~~ snip ~~~ > > > [...] > > > To: someone@example.org, "line > > > break" , someoneelse@example.org > > > User-Agent: Notmuch/0.9-101-g81dad07 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) > > > [...] > > > ~~~ snap ~~~ > > Do you happen to know how the strangely folded "to" header was > > produced for this message? I just entered/copied all the addresses into one long To: line, and then let message-mode do its thing. > No, but Thomas might. Thomas, the problematic message is > id:877ghpqckb.fsf@kepler.schwinge.homeip.net Here is the header from the message as I sent it: To: Samuel Thibault , Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>, fotis.koutoulakis@gmail.com, Ian Lance Taylor , toscano.pino@tiscali.it, Luis Machado , =?utf-8?B?6ZmG5bKz?= And this is what I received from the bug-hurd mailing list: To: Samuel Thibault , Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>, , "Ian Lance Taylor" , , Luis Machado , =?utf-8?B?6ZmG5bKz?= So the "corruption" (if it is declared as one; I don't have time right now to follow your RFC interpretation) must have happened after sending it off -- perhaps my company's Microsoft Exchange server (as Justus received a direct copy from that one), or even msmtp used as the local MTA. Grüße, Thomas