From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3DE431FBD for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 19:41:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t5m6CNzbX-Kv for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 19:41:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu [18.7.68.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30E7E431FBC for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 19:41:47 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 12074425-f79906d000000cf9-ce-531e77ea01c3 Received: from mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.43]) (using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 29.71.03321.AE77E135; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 22:41:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id s2B2fjC1006254; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 22:41:46 -0400 Received: from awakening.csail.mit.edu (awakening.csail.mit.edu [18.26.4.91]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as amdragon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id s2B2fiDE019678 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 10 Mar 2014 22:41:45 -0400 Received: from amthrax by awakening.csail.mit.edu with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WNCdT-0008U4-NV; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 22:41:43 -0400 From: Austin Clements To: Mark Walters , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2.1 6/7] emacs: search: use orig-tags in search In-Reply-To: <1393068305-1587-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> References: <1392841212-8494-7-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> <1393068305-1587-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17~rc2+14~g06f47e0 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 22:41:43 -0400 Message-ID: <8738ip3194.fsf@awakening.csail.mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrIIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixCmqrfuqXC7Y4M1vCYvVc3ksrt+cyezA 5LFz1l12j2erbjEHMEVx2aSk5mSWpRbp2yVwZfT0/WQr2MBW0Xd0HVsDYxdrFyMnh4SAicSJ /y9YIGwxiQv31rN1MXJxCAnMZpKYevckK4SzkVFi645VUJnTTBJ/Jy9ghHCWMEr07bjIDNLP JqAhsW3/ckYQW0TAVeLpt89gcWEBF4nLjzcCdXNwcAp4SmxuyIHobWWUWDhpB1iNqECSxOmp v8FuYhFQlXh9az+YzQt0364n8xkhbEGJkzOfgN3KLKAlcePfS6YJjAKzkKRmIUktYGRaxSib klulm5uYmVOcmqxbnJyYl5dapGuhl5tZopeaUrqJERSS7C6qOxgnHFI6xCjAwajEwxvgKxcs xJpYVlyZe4hRkoNJSZR3AjCghfiS8lMqMxKLM+KLSnNSiw8xSnAwK4nwnrYAyvGmJFZWpRbl w6SkOViUxHn7zkoECwmkJ5akZqemFqQWwWRlODiUJHhzQIYKFqWmp1akZeaUIKSZODhBhvMA Dc8DqeEtLkjMLc5Mh8ifYlSUEuedWQaUEABJZJTmwfXCUsYrRnGgV4R5W0HaeYDpBq77FdBg JqDBzcelQAaXJCKkpBoYsyTCtDrZykprT7MXcjy/e4I7Q+vPs4LJ9iy7p7Knr2O7qc1zIkE5 9frRKC27mdX8ElYPLefdF/SZv2nSutUdujMVX2xUctW/FXLk5ukFtqzLwlgrSqUrIt48vp5z s+LhIvu5PodimHunPOFKNmnxFOtbUlKy9PJa/UoTBe7M0onXe03/yJ9QYinOSDTUYi4qTgQA DTNocPQCAAA= X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 02:41:53 -0000 On Sat, 22 Feb 2014, Mark Walters wrote: > This uses the recent functionality to show the tag changes in the > search buffer. Currently this is only used to show changes the search > buffer makes itself: i.e., it does not make display any changes > reflecting tagging done by other notmuch-buffers. > --- > This is a rewrite of this single patch. When trying to rebase my > unread stuff on top of this series I realised that the previous > version split the notmuch-search-show-result in a a strange place. In > particular the code for "is this the target thread" so should only be > called when building the buffer not when redisplaying a thread. Of > course it works either way but I think this is cleaner. I like this better than v2 as well. > Best wishes > > Mark