From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84BF6DE0AF8
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 16:49:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.307
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.244, 
 RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.55, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled
Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id tmbT6eUqGRg4 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
 Sat, 13 Feb 2016 16:49:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197])
 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FABF6DE0A9A
 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 16:49:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84)
 (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)
 id 1aUkrf-0001MN-QP; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 19:48:39 -0500
Received: (nullmailer pid 3693 invoked by uid 1000);
 Sun, 14 Feb 2016 00:49:19 -0000
From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
To: "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us>
Cc: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: nmbug in the Debian packages?
In-Reply-To: <20160213220250.GB4265@odin.tremily.us>
References: <cun37t5r91p.fsf@disaster-area.hh.sledj.net>
 <87twlj8mix.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <20160208193804.GE4265@odin.tremily.us>
 <87lh6o79vb.fsf@zancas.localnet> <20160213220250.GB4265@odin.tremily.us>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+26~g9404723 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1
 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 20:49:19 -0400
Message-ID: <8737sw9kvk.fsf@zancas.localnet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 00:49:28 -0000

"W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> writes:

> I'd floated notmuch-dtag earlier [1].  Does that sound right?  Or do
> folks prefer another name?

I'd like to hear feedback from others about that.

>> It would also need some tests.
>
> In tests/, or devel/dtag/tests?  If the latter, how should I handle
> the test framework?  Symlinks to the main tests/?  Copies?  Sharness
> submodule?  Other ideas?

in test/

>
> That seems like something that could be handled independently.  If
> folks want to set it up, adjusting the !command handler in notmuch.c's
> main() or adjusting find_command to fall back to =E2=80=9Cthis is probabl=
y an
> external command=E2=80=9D seem doable.
>
yeah, I guess there's no need to overcomplicate thing. But let's adopt a
git-style convention of "notmuch-foo" for script names, so we can make
it more transparent later, if needed.