From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00E36DE2083 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 05:34:36 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.005 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.005 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DWemZBxYbrS7 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 05:34:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67CC56DE2080 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 05:34:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1clyCY-0001pP-7L; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 08:33:54 -0500 Received: (nullmailer pid 13516 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 09 Mar 2017 13:34:33 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: add support for stashing formatted timestamp In-Reply-To: <20170110181525.18269-1-jani@nikula.org> References: <20170110181525.18269-1-jani@nikula.org> Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 09:34:32 -0400 Message-ID: <8737em60bb.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 13:34:37 -0000 Jani Nikula writes: > notmuch-show-stash-date stashes the Date: header of the message > verbatim. While that is useful, sometimes more control of the output > is desirable. > > Add support for stashing the message timestamp (as parsed by gmime at > the lib level from the Date: header) according to a user customizable > format. The user can use this to stash the message date in the > preferred format, or perhaps as a date: range query, for example > "date:@%s.." to find all messages since the current message. > --- I'm not opposed to this, but I'd like at least one vote from someone other than Jani that would find it useful. d