From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA106DE01F8 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 08:24:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.006 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.006 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.007, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v3bKk-RfRW4O for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 08:24:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B72526DE0122 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 08:24:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1g9XOG-0008O2-2f; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 11:24:12 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 32078 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 08 Oct 2018 15:24:11 -0000 From: David Bremner To: David Edmondson , Jeff Templon , William Casarin , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: filter tag completions by current query In-Reply-To: References: <20181008114752.14457-1-jb55@jb55.com> Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 12:24:11 -0300 Message-ID: <8736tgtqas.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 15:24:20 -0000 David Edmondson writes: > On Monday, 2018-10-08 at 15:14:50 +02, Jeff Templon wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> David Edmondson writes: >> >>> On Monday, 2018-10-08 at 14:46:25 +02, Jeff Templon wrote: >>> >>>> hi guys, >>>> >>>> a question from a newbie - where are all these things documented? The >>>> notmuch-emacs documentation that I could find was pretty basic IIRC. >>> >>> Jeff, which things do you mean? >> >> I see all sorts of things being discussed in these patches that look >> useful, but they didn't seem to show up in the manual. I'll try to >> remember to jot it down next time, but there are a lot of things that >> only seem to be mentioned if one does "C-h m" in the mode itself. > > We don't have a good manual, I agree. > > Producing one is hard :-( > I posted a patch series some time ago [1] to bring docstrings into the manual. It doesn't magically make it a good manual, but it makes it a bit less discouraging to work on the manual, at least for me. [1]: https://nmbug.notmuchmail.org/nmweb/show/20180614003245.25112-1-david%40tethera.net