From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E5D6DE0FFA for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 04:33:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.044 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.044 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.043, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WoBMroHS5r_u for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 04:33:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E57776DE0F8C for ; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 04:33:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hXlDi-0003yj-Mg for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 07:33:42 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 25292 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 03 Jun 2019 11:33:59 -0000 From: David Bremner To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: use separate doctrees for distinct builders In-Reply-To: <20190601022452.23562-1-david@tethera.net> References: <20190601022452.23562-1-david@tethera.net> Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2019 08:33:59 -0300 Message-ID: <8736kqq4wo.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2019 11:33:46 -0000 David Bremner writes: > It seems our previous attempt with order-only targets was not > sufficient to avoid problems with sphinx-builds doctree cache [0]. > Looking around at other people's approaches [1], using seperate > doctrees was suggested. I guess there might be a slight loss of > efficiency, but it seems more robust. pushed to release (soon to master), with Tomi's spellink fichs