From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242606DE0E86 for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2019 09:10:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.055 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.055 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.054, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ilZV6Sgx0JPe for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2019 09:10:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16A486DE0E84 for ; Sun, 1 Sep 2019 09:10:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i4SQe-0005TF-0L; Sun, 01 Sep 2019 12:10:12 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 18214 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 01 Sep 2019 16:05:48 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Tomas Nordin , Andreas Kloeckner , 934082@bugs.debian.org Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Bug#934082: elpa-notmuch: Shows remote images even when requested not to In-Reply-To: <87blw43v5a.fsf@fliptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <87o9114mx3.fsf@bolt.d.tiker.net> <87d0hhz15g.fsf@tethera.net> <877e7pdjlh.fsf@bolt.d.tiker.net> <87blw43v5a.fsf@fliptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2019 13:05:48 -0300 Message-ID: <8736hg80ir.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2019 16:10:27 -0000 Tomas Nordin writes: > > I wonder if it is due to the w3m package or something else? > notmuch does not know anything about w3m, so I'm reasonably sure this is not a notmuch problem aside from the doc problem I already mentioned: we should probably say "if you don't use shr, you're on your own", in some slightly more friendly way.