From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AEDA6DE01A9 for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2019 06:32:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.063 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.063 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.062, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FqmTAYJx3tuK for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2019 06:32:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 966466DE01A1 for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2019 06:32:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1idb8F-0004Do-4x; Sat, 07 Dec 2019 09:32:27 -0500 Received: (nullmailer pid 2328948 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 07 Dec 2019 14:32:26 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: shipping elisp for notmuch in elpa-notmuch debian package In-Reply-To: <87sglxywv3.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> References: <87a7887akl.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <87muc8qmkl.fsf@tethera.net> <877e3c6s0o.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <87eexjrisr.fsf@tethera.net> <87sglxywv3.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2019 10:32:26 -0400 Message-ID: <8736dwkxz9.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2019 14:32:32 -0000 Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > I generally don't use /usr/bin/info, but when i do, it's from the > standalone info reader. > > I also note that "M-x info" from within emacs does have a top-level > mention of (for example) GnuTLS, which is only present (afaict) due to > files in /usr/share/info/ > > so my conclusion from this is that the debian package should be shipping > .info files in /usr/share/info. sure, I don't really object to this. I guess I was just lazy / impressed-with-myself for finding an upstream way to install info files. As long as you don't break "make elpa", I don't mind making the debian packaging more standard.