From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 622C5429E52
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 07:31:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.3
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id uKoZsLGQQdpa for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Sat, 14 Jan 2012 07:31:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B399A429E50
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 07:31:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zancas.localnet
	(fctnnbsc36w-156034076032.pppoe-dynamic.High-Speed.nb.bellaliant.net
	[156.34.76.32]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0EFVGOi020354
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Sat, 14 Jan 2012 11:31:17 -0400
Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77)
	(envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)
	id 1Rm5Zc-0001IU-Gy; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 11:31:16 -0400
From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] cli: slightly refactor "notmuch reply" address
 scanning functions
In-Reply-To: <f994789d065d898911bbf127a7453137a9ba8e27.1326551350.git.jani@nikula.org>
References: <cover.1326551350.git.jani@nikula.org>
	<f994789d065d898911bbf127a7453137a9ba8e27.1326551350.git.jani@nikula.org>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 11:31:16 -0400
Message-ID: <871ur2jo6z.fsf@zancas.localnet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 15:31:20 -0000

On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 16:46:15 +0200, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:
> Slightly refactor "notmuch reply" recipient and user from address scanning
> functions in preparation for reply-to-sender feature.
> 

Pushed, bindings change and all.

This series definitely needs a NEWS item. 

Perhaps some kind soul could add a wiki entry explaining to people how
to swap the bindings, just in case there people who don't like the
"one-true-reply-bindings" (cough).

d