From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC3C431FB6 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 08:44:26 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wfqIirom3ZdX for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 08:44:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85BAD431FAF for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 08:44:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034089108.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net ([156.34.89.108] helo=zancas.localnet) by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TXEAP-0002Zz-1T; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 12:44:21 -0400 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1TXE9X-0004e4-Iz; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 12:43:27 -0400 From: David Bremner To: Mark Walters , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] contrib: pick: bugfix when trying to show a non-message In-Reply-To: <1352562350-8219-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> References: <1352562350-8219-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+75~g984212d (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 12:43:17 -0400 Message-ID: <871ug1z9wa.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam_bar: - X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 16:44:27 -0000 Mark Walters writes: > This version changes the `when' to and `if' and adds the fix for the > quoting. Sorry to be such a pedant about this. Is it obvious to other people that (if nil 'something) evaluates to nil? If so, nevermind. But for me, if's in an expression context need two branches. d