From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53781431FBC for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 04:19:17 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uqh0SkJgYHGC for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 04:19:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7326431FB6 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 04:19:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from fctnnbsc30w-142167090129.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net ([142.167.90.129] helo=zancas.localnet) by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tgwtb-0003tC-LX; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 08:19:11 -0400 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1TgwtW-0003dK-4Z; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 08:19:06 -0400 From: David Bremner To: Jameson Graef Rollins , Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] TODO: date range queries - check In-Reply-To: <877gouine4.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> References: <1354833276-6219-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org> <877gouine4.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+75~g984212d (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 08:19:06 -0400 Message-ID: <871uf2ukat.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam_bar: - X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:19:17 -0000 Jameson Graef Rollins writes: > Has this TODO really been resolved? Do searches like "since:2009-01-1" > or "until:2009-01-1" really now work? As far as I can tell they don't. > Nor are they documented if they do. For specifying one-ended ranges, I find the current syntax OK-ish. It would be reasonable to formulate a seperate TODO for supporting things like date:2012-12-07 d