Re: [PATCH v3 08/16] reorganize indexing of multipart/signed and multipart/encrypted

[David Bremner <david@tethera.net>]

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> writes:

> This prepares the codebase for a cleaner changeset for dealing with
> indexing some encrypted messages in the clear.
> ---
>  lib/index.cc | 39 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/index.cc b/lib/index.cc
> index f166aef..ab0fd78 100644
> --- a/lib/index.cc
> +++ b/lib/index.cc
> @@ -333,27 +333,26 @@ _index_mime_part (notmuch_message_t *message,
>  	GMimeMultipart *multipart = GMIME_MULTIPART (part);
>  	int i;
>  
> -	if (GMIME_IS_MULTIPART_SIGNED (multipart))
> -	  _notmuch_message_add_term (message, "tag", "signed");
> -
> -	if (GMIME_IS_MULTIPART_ENCRYPTED (multipart))
> -	  _notmuch_message_add_term (message, "tag", "encrypted");
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < g_mime_multipart_get_count (multipart); i++) {
> -	    if (GMIME_IS_MULTIPART_SIGNED (multipart)) {
> -		/* Don't index the signature. */
> -		if (i == 1)
> -		    continue;
> -		if (i > 1)
> -		    _notmuch_database_log (_notmuch_message_database (message),
> -					  "Warning: Unexpected extra parts of multipart/signed. Indexing anyway.\n");
> -	    }
> -	    if (GMIME_IS_MULTIPART_ENCRYPTED (multipart)) {
> -		/* Don't index encrypted parts. */
> -		continue;
> -	    }
> +	if (GMIME_IS_MULTIPART_SIGNED (multipart)) {
> +	    _notmuch_message_add_term (message, "tag", "signed");
> +	    /* FIXME: should we try to validate the signature? */
> +	    
> +	    /* FIXME: is it always just the first part that is signed in
> +	     all multipart/signed messages?*/
>  	    _index_mime_part (message,
> -			      g_mime_multipart_get_part (multipart, i));
> +			      g_mime_multipart_get_part (multipart, 0));

It took me a long moment to understand the change from "index part if not 1"
to "index part 0". If that deserved explanation (which I'm not so certain
about), it would be in the commit message.