From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF206DE15C7 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 16:49:04 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.034 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.034 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.023, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j4rdg49J-zQ6 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 16:49:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44EAD6DE15C2 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 16:49:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ac0Pd-0007vP-Dr; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 19:49:41 -0500 Received: (nullmailer pid 24954 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 05 Mar 2016 00:49:01 -0000 From: David Bremner To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] STYLE: document some rules about variable declarations In-Reply-To: <1455383479-9946-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> References: <1455383479-9946-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+26~g9404723 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 20:49:01 -0400 Message-ID: <871t7pvjeq.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2016 00:49:05 -0000 David Bremner writes: > No-one seemed opposed to C99 style loop variable declarations. The > requirement to declare variables at the top of blocks is maybe a little > more contested, but I believe it reflects the status quo. pushed both of these style guide updates