From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9F46DE01E8 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2018 00:49:57 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t__sWT8XUYQ1 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2018 00:49:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [162.247.75.118]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B97A6DE01EC for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2018 00:49:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from fifthhorseman.net (ip174-65-50-221.sd.sd.cox.net [174.65.50.221]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8108F99B; Sun, 18 Feb 2018 03:49:52 -0500 (EST) Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 159D42139D; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 23:42:05 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor To: "W. Trevor King" Cc: Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: [PATCH] nmbug: explicitly prefer python3 In-Reply-To: <20180212175333.GA23662@valgrind.us> References: <20180209043211.4792-1-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> <20180209171257.GG30368@valgrind.us> <87bmgyt3gf.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <20180209204624.GL30368@valgrind.us> <87tvumrhcb.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <20180212175333.GA23662@valgrind.us> Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 20:42:04 -0800 Message-ID: <871shinc2r.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 08:49:57 -0000 On Mon 2018-02-12 09:53:33 -0800, W. Trevor King wrote: > That Python-2-only tool should be using python2 in its shebang. This > is exactly the sort of issue that PEP 394 was created to address. Thanks for the suggestion, i've asked them to do that: https://bugs.debian.org/890282 > Once you patch that tool to follow PEP 394, you should have no problem > adjusting your system to also follow PEP 394. heh, that might be easier said than done, but i appreciate your ambition. --dkg