From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id SNpzHg62a2OVzQAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 15:15:42 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id aDczHg62a2OUawEAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 15:15:42 +0100 Received: from mail.notmuchmail.org (yantan.tethera.net [135.181.149.255]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 196E4F4B5 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 15:15:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.notmuchmail.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EA35F3B0; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 14:06:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by mail.notmuchmail.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E19885F35E for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 14:06:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1osliO-0007PZ-6V; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 09:06:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=uPWyLHBQIelwsPMUSycDnnZCk61I2zHXhHhJ3PfMUmw=; b=fKOzsDFJVts3 KeM03/tj1QkXs3nUJntzjuaOVeO1PmdFrbXvg1/XusBhAmZTE71HD5DapR10PiXioC+h0OzEGF2vh RlWVE/8ShUjwicJLdScYSnYeC3cfdJ7tMqFXxrhBVmrIEJdDrN9tMi/JGLWm3rUS7WBQDS4AM/rue 1Ewn1DMcBa24Uo6RAYd/XUFaRJC9aDNVNHoJvXnJdusdW1YuZGrmXPb1bHD4dIJjwz6THFXNfImTV zwOQelqQUgJMVuUQkCijkJqZTM49zxzBCRfXHBDQrveSNUgQ+aC5z5ywAucyTFOngHIWNJ2HlgkZt UPVTNIgbRFstt3hLWbAszQ==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1osliM-0003c6-Sx; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 09:06:03 -0500 Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 16:06:00 +0200 Message-Id: <83sfiste7r.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Gregor Zattler In-Reply-To: <87pmdwgrvo.fsf@no.workgroup> (message from Gregor Zattler on Wed, 09 Nov 2022 14:49:15 +0100) Subject: Re: bug#59147: 29.0.50; dispnew.c:1456: Emacs fatal error: assertion failed: row >= 0 && row < matrix->nrows References: <87o7tg718m.fsf@no.workgroup> <831qqcuuuc.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmdwgrvo.fsf@no.workgroup> Message-ID-Hash: YJGM4YKFXMCZUXLQIWL2CWGDHDKQQKCQ X-Message-ID-Hash: YJGM4YKFXMCZUXLQIWL2CWGDHDKQQKCQ X-MailFrom: eliz@gnu.org X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-notmuch.notmuchmail.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.3 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: DE ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1668003342; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-owner:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=gjbADyB1rTB1Z9s7zCRT6uxu3KYa9g+W1dKr8ZIfPzg=; b=a9L7dIAcMogsG3pcBn8GaxsFzjzr+qp4MeffWabxCGPOyfuC/ogAHY8NInooS0WYXO82CD wq6/XtP5w55y0JGTE6BvRg63QjsUp+lBvEeflSrMe/LfnEZD9tRXb7XY8uKl+iIuJGJTv/ lkSDkLW28h9XCSpmo4P9kTWDvxUqRKyAWaMpi9yYf6Lkjw7WbMEpT1KPsSdcQpsQktCPmO Q8pW/IZ7nIz7w8W1B8/a/zDhVpNCl55rj0HheBt92wBlpunvI/Tjly2ZrpiYSK5V46mWRG M2TzN1U1zWNr9zqCoKiguU1N6aLw9vtA6qYvgesgzok8Ig3neO2DwFcyvl5yIA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1668003342; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=rPZc6qpg5TLE6MB/3DI2EQsQYam6kbSTvaqC3pOp/YmHuJevfPfp1/FmmcDgV5QRE3plkO 3AUL7mtIxi0vRX486MNpKwlIjGT9DHrof1hjBOGqXWItWYalrC7jNkR5O41S/l5QkIddLY Pcb3dzT5m+z2LjqEtpZBMkawEwaeZ44dGe2Xzygc2JjMwcil42v7cnYALjr7X86qohIClO Pr4LC3tDUR/q9O/HBmoF+YbBpbGSmwnAIBsluPXR4jWQ0sTC/ghUYCvy85SbTiYfkizFpR 1GjFzvItqsANjV24NYveH/ydrzvPQJswVOVUtfNzwIFQ1GPMwzJFOac68tUOWA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("body hash did not verify") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=fKOzsDFJ; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gnu.org (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org designates 135.181.149.255 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 6.79 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("body hash did not verify") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=fKOzsDFJ; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gnu.org (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org designates 135.181.149.255 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 196E4F4B5 X-Spam-Score: 6.79 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: 7kc+CTwB9G6d > From: Gregor Zattler > Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, notmuch@notmuchmail.org > Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 14:49:15 +0100 > > > What does the below produce: > > > > (gdb) frame 2 > > (gdb) p matrix->nrows > > (gdb) frame 2 > #2 0x000055555559d310 in matrix_row (matrix=0x55555d44d470, row=8) at dispnew.c:1456 > 1456 eassert (row >= 0 && row < matrix->nrows); > (gdb) p matrix->nrows > $1 = 7 > (gdb) Can you describe what does notmuch-jump do and maybe show its code? The backtrace seems to indicate that it reads from the minibuffer, but in that case, does it mean the mini-window was 7-lines high in this case? Also, can you describe what you do to trigger this assertion violation? > While working I got another (x)backtracei, in another emacs > daemon, which I guess is related: It's an exact same problem.