From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7F56DE02CD for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 11:19:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.18 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.18 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLYTO=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pzl_KeybWCIP for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 11:19:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com (mail-pa0-f52.google.com [209.85.220.52]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA8EB6DE0297 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 11:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id vu5so40523077pab.0 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 11:19:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:reply-to:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OBTasAQDPYEl6xHHNsQWHBO+qTsyPoqus8dXDgFX6ac=; b=HCNCxO8PAHMz9S5QfLMWz4uDyFIIH7PZj/f0wfyC19umH5kxT5yedJiaAh33GLbezv qbrtyN+TLiZZXa2ZwtF13ZXIJJ4hF9ZZRXAv5akwPgFusK3HoReGGaBe/jMueYp6Rqyb QUdTdWcDaeeFmY2lY6pF7eUNLB+v+pilNIBA+cQcuWoj1O1p1BrUT8q0ihrDW9QX9Ozj kZhpBP42wvZPuUapc2In0bN8+sxsK7j7LVCXBIxqw06lxe1NbLLlaO0hWqhwwTBN5EhA DyxEymKUBni/AwKanI5gtifbu7UEPpG1Z/7oVcqTf1jq5ZZHN4uAWRbdtnBcToWPb45O iONw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:reply-to:to:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OBTasAQDPYEl6xHHNsQWHBO+qTsyPoqus8dXDgFX6ac=; b=Y/HtHqIt3J/9BgC8GML1pd/2jjAYBNLOmFl8JYvKiaP/F6RmFu99EiVRy2A/qSBAVM d5GB4SiKz2KfvLiRV9VvPv4+P64G4/aRh2y8j7kjWXa9i+8renfoM/6MFhiKfy0qKGaD 8cMuGaJTilXv8fLmPZzgrLW9fceNw3+/x3730C+OKjPEoA1vI+mZCwbYM3ncfQ4/SYXx Th75K4HCl05dHEdPPzAhxqK0hxrND4GD0vyvp+c1PNty5fPVKDbJaTbyM6OAiB4cW/vY /l1fk/8jttfjyIwUtrp5ZnTrFePMf7P3fkZ9eAX5u/rjaZS7+PWI9p5I3XiA7tkFmicW jv3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rmq8k68FtiAyOfKPNDSLl0yc2O4Q3W+Gidftjr52JgFpb7rWu15WsaiickeLfU2jw== X-Received: by 10.66.222.202 with SMTP id qo10mr10074389pac.76.1476382767403; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 11:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([204.121.136.153]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 188sm7250913pfd.9.2016.10.13.11.19.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Oct 2016 11:19:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 12:19:17 -0600 From: nlhowell@gmail.com Reply-To: nlhowell@gmail.com, notmuch@notmuchmail.org To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, nlhowell@gmail.com, David Bremner Message-ID: <57ffd0251b0a4_6fed5783cdf@mercury.notmuch> In-Reply-To: <87h98gjhfk.fsf@tesseract.cs.unb.ca> References: <20160929152116.GB17434@tuna.imca.aps.anl.gov> <57f838f72d46b_5dbc3d83c50@mercury.notmuch> <57fc34d628e80_b64e27844fd@mercury.notmuch> <87h98gjhfk.fsf@tesseract.cs.unb.ca> Subject: Re: Status of Vim client Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 11:24:11 -0700 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 18:19:28 -0000 David Bremner wrote: > Nick Howell writes: > > Nick Howell wrote: > >> I have a few patchsets adding: > > > >> - attachment support in compose - mailcap support for multipart > >> messages > > > > Mildly clean (imo), independent versions of these have been sent > > to the mailing list; they are meant to be applied on-top of > > felipec's repository. (I was unaware of, and haven't looked at, > > the imain repo.) > > For whatever reason, I didn't see those messages on the (i.e. this) > mailing list. Strange. I will make ettiquette adjustments and re-send. Here's my smtp log: > Oct 10 17:32:12 host=smtp.gmail.com tls=on auth=on user=nlhowell from=nlhowell@gmail.com recipients=notmuch@notmuchmail.org,nlhowell@gmail.com mailsize=1023 smtpstatus=250 smtpmsg='250 2.0.0 OK 1476142322 m128sm382316ioa.41 - gsmtp' exitcode=EX_OK > Oct 10 17:32:27 host=smtp.gmail.com tls=on auth=on user=nlhowell from=nlhowell@gmail.com recipients=notmuch@notmuchmail.org,nlhowell@gmail.com mailsize=4032 smtpstatus=250 smtpmsg='250 2.0.0 OK 1476142337 b133sm7677395iti.21 - gsmtp' exitcode=EX_OK > Oct 10 17:32:43 host=smtp.gmail.com tls=on auth=on user=nlhowell from=nlhowell@gmail.com recipients=notmuch@notmuchmail.org,nlhowell@gmail.com mailsize=4085 smtpstatus=250 smtpmsg='250 2.0.0 OK 1476142353 n69sm7704802ita.0 - gsmtp' exitcode=EX_OK > Oct 10 18:25:13 host=smtp.gmail.com tls=on auth=on user=nlhowell from=nlhowell@gmail.com recipients=notmuch@notmuchmail.org,nlhowell@gmail.com mailsize=1149 smtpstatus=250 smtpmsg='250 2.0.0 OK 1476145503 fi6sm530779pac.20 - gsmtp' exitcode=EX_OK > Oct 10 18:25:18 host=smtp.gmail.com tls=on auth=on user=nlhowell from=nlhowell@gmail.com recipients=notmuch@notmuchmail.org,nlhowell@gmail.com mailsize=3608 smtpstatus=250 smtpmsg='250 2.0.0 OK 1476145508 n77sm507192pfi.82 - gsmtp' exitcode=EX_OK > Oct 10 18:25:23 host=smtp.gmail.com tls=on auth=on user=nlhowell from=nlhowell@gmail.com recipients=notmuch@notmuchmail.org,nlhowell@gmail.com mailsize=1071 smtpstatus=250 smtpmsg='250 2.0.0 OK 1476145514 e1sm542594pap.11 - gsmtp' exitcode=EX_OK > Oct 10 18:25:29 host=smtp.gmail.com tls=on auth=on user=nlhowell from=nlhowell@gmail.com recipients=notmuch@notmuchmail.org,nlhowell@gmail.com mailsize=1422 smtpstatus=250 smtpmsg='250 2.0.0 OK 1476145519 k67sm507280pfb.86 - gsmtp' exitcode=EX_OK > Oct 10 18:25:34 host=smtp.gmail.com tls=on auth=on user=nlhowell from=nlhowell@gmail.com recipients=notmuch@notmuchmail.org,nlhowell@gmail.com mailsize=970 smtpstatus=250 smtpmsg='250 2.0.0 OK 1476145524 n2sm286444pfa.75 - gsmtp' exitcode=EX_OK > Oct 10 18:25:39 host=smtp.gmail.com tls=on auth=on user=nlhowell from=nlhowell@gmail.com recipients=notmuch@notmuchmail.org,nlhowell@gmail.com mailsize=4136 smtpstatus=250 smtpmsg='250 2.0.0 OK 1476145530 j6sm497374paa.44 - gsmtp' exitcode=EX_OK > Oct 10 18:25:44 host=smtp.gmail.com tls=on auth=on user=nlhowell from=nlhowell@gmail.com recipients=notmuch@notmuchmail.org,nlhowell@gmail.com mailsize=1653 smtpstatus=250 smtpmsg='250 2.0.0 OK 1476145535 g9sm503882paw.40 - gsmtp' exitcode=EX_OK > Oct 10 18:40:12 host=smtp.gmail.com tls=on auth=on user=nlhowell from=nlhowell@gmail.com recipients=notmuch@notmuchmail.org,nlhowell@gmail.com,nlhowell@gmail.com mailsize=2058 smtpstatus=250 smtpmsg='250 2.0.0 OK 1476146402 n7sm558994pfn.62 - gsmtp' exitcode=EX_OK I assumed they were getting moderated, but perhaps they got dropped? > > p.s. please let me know if I broke some rule of patch mailing > > ettiquette, e.g. should I have included "vim:" or based the > > patches off of notmuch.git? > > Yes, from our point of view notmuch.git is upstream, so all patches > for potential inclusion should be based off of that. > > It would be handy to include vim: in the subject line, but it's not > absolutely crucial. I'll make these two corrections. Cheers, Nick