From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50357431FC7 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 15:39:24 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.438 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E7fN1PPnm6c6 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 15:39:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.webfaction.com (mail6.webfaction.com [74.55.86.74]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94069431FC2 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 15:39:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (87-231-242-54.rev.numericable.fr [87.231.242.54]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6B359A3FD3; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 23:39:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 00:39:09 +0100 From: Bartosz Telenczuk To: Franz Fellner , Bartosz Message-ID: <54d00a9d68d9c_47c3ff0b58781fc89@bartels-MacBook-Pro.local.notmuch> In-Reply-To: <54c1608bd22a9_67b66d530832@TP_L520.notmuch> References: <1420891384-992-1-git-send-email-telenczuk@unic.cnrs-gif.fr> <1420891384-992-2-git-send-email-telenczuk@unic.cnrs-gif.fr> <54c1608bd22a9_67b66d530832@TP_L520.notmuch> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/4] VIM: implemented message folding in thread view Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, Bartosz X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 23:39:24 -0000 Hi Franz, > We already had folding via syntax in Ians fork. It turned out to be not that great. > https://github.com/imain/notmuch-vim/issues/3 Ah all right, I just thought syntax fold would be more elegant. > In short: > Those syntax fold marks are for one specific notmuch-show-buffer. If you open a second show-buffer those > new fold marks will overwrite the ones from the previous show-buffer. Switching between those two show-buffers > will spin up CPU for quite some time and completely lock vim. True, I can reproduce this bug in my implementation. > It also would help a lot if we could reoranize the sources as in Ians fork. Would simplify testing, coding (proper filetype) and backporting patches. Agree. We should come up with a plan how to integrate the changes back into notmuch. Do you have any ideas? Cheers, Bartosz