From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ED50431FC9 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:38:36 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.639 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.639 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 65TOeIX6nmTJ for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:38:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9C56431FBC for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:38:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id em10so16951458wid.1 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:38:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:attach; bh=BG7sYm2S6iJK2/nib9MUMpzZ4C6JJqLPQad+8dt13dU=; b=oMG+BaLYco5JITJ+Z1R7UPKWsVcPvpt/PKAL9CuiJYCVWkzZS6ieb8YEzWIOG1pMUO EYpaCPlWUxk3KV5y49F/s71VYJnQAxnhUx4urDAilEZF/clEePpYqHyeEx2FCYLzU5UC PXdGgC8p1j8i3NjCIYWUlsXebhkcmpIxDAfPxmaYuI5m6CSGQ8hGfNmSB6sDGKjZ/ELB NbFRN4PeWHRt+g/Xl3VwWYifETOwDl18e4F/kQeELjE3W/pFCGCS7O6QV/apU1gCXPVs CO4Lbh0rODzRDnyO3QYqz6HOYfs2HkCPwOPoSK1TYZRBRcSw77BhTUNQwuoMjNTg1ctw eC/A== X-Received: by 10.180.218.39 with SMTP id pd7mr60028604wic.21.1421865509630; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:38:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (p4FFB8A19.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.251.138.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k3sm837085wje.30.2015.01.21.10.38.27 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:38:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 19:38:58 +0100 From: Franz Fellner To: Bartosz Telenczuk Message-ID: <54bff2427d3c1_5b9d145d304d6@TP_L520.notmuch> In-Reply-To: <54bd89e062df1_a663fec9d49e200a3@bts-MacBook-Pro.local.notmuch> References: <1412181367-10906-1-git-send-email-imain@stemwinder.org> <54bd89e062df1_a663fec9d49e200a3@bts-MacBook-Pro.local.notmuch> Subject: RE: [PATCH] VIM: Automatically refresh folder screen Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Attach: Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 18:38:36 -0000 Hi Bartosz, Great to see one more person interested in notmuch-vim! Hopefully this will make review a little bit easier. Bartosz Telenczuk wrote: > Ian Main wrote: > > This patch makes the folder screen refresh each time you 'enter' it. > > This way when you read a folder and mark items as read the changes are > > reflected immediately when you return to the folder view. > > That is a good starting point, but why don't we refresh every time we mark an item in the folder screen? Personally I don't see the benefit. It's a useless call to notmuch for every cursor-move. Especially with the current inefficient implementation. Pressing '=' will refresh the folder view manually. If you want to get notified about new mail it's better to call e.g. notify-send after notmuch new. Automatic refresh after you finished reading your new mails and come back to folders IMHO makes sense. But probably Ian has a different oppinion. Franz > > Bartosz > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch