From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC70431FAF for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:24:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F7jQqUj6IBYM for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:24:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [209.234.253.108]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47EA431FAE for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:24:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.23.207] (dsl254-070-154.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.70.154]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DDDC6F970 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:24:39 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4F708A2D.90800@fifthhorseman.net> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:24:29 -0400 From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120325 Icedove/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Reply code with TEXT/PLAIN References: <87d3814qkv.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <8762drl766.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> In-Reply-To: <8762drl766.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig61FDFA38AC29B61BA2540529" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: notmuch List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:24:44 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig61FDFA38AC29B61BA2540529 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/26/2012 11:21 AM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > Does it make sense for the cli to canonicalize the content types to > always be lower case? Or should it continue to just pass the content > type exactly as it appears in the original message? Given that > consumers should parse it case insensitively, it maybe doesn't matter, > but it might also be nice for us to be consistent. i think "notmuch emits the content-type in the exact form contained in the underlying message" is a good flavor of consistency. --dkg --------------enig61FDFA38AC29B61BA2540529 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJPcIozXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQwRUU1QkU5NzkyODJEODBCOUY3NTQwRjFD Q0QyRUQ5NEQyMTczOUU5AAoJEMzS7ZTSFznpumoQAIiZ0FDnWAS3kBQ45KFiafOQ U03/lnAfX2YLWfa/jyut68XtqkfVRX0dj4EJTHQP7QNa+xLCQ8fnZb3/EvZKmE2/ 1sl/z4z8Dii54hDuxWKs01SrzexvXlIgRYGXFkOhvsd8LKIxvvm83bl3g887b35C f8Y3j4i24RD9/3ecSa02ay6R1tYqNPiIVDvJVAq8/+ogJ99crQUDXP91PmIhHt4L s25OiL/qOp14EMtTpyWmSchay6pNhd88k981dgX9q1rFUEWHWDk2K7DZ87JvozNk dYhgUAkNpeFyiiGsrlSNiSvhsgR6dvfCYB+fFP6Fofs1Df12nWssVR4GazVnOdH9 TfTciTuilQ9bXyIkQY8zZyuwBUIOkIsRnBTDQaBIY51kGYP0z4gPKlwYhl+iYjm4 GDuIM/o9078iz+5RU+l2bBD05AO+vKzAvElJg7vMqqwpiTN9eFpANTCitwTpvjGQ 1e+IsxKXJN61P7xcoMovdQats1zrOnk/D3vbFEwESFxKjWQQKQX7DauJnK74YPY4 j0wYzzJyzxL/Nj1y0nFQt2wVlgDvkmKkww9190b55A+3Arhi/rSMPJYgXaGEQmjE ACWWTm2ElxGXNvZzY/dZyukqldISL0Q5oqy24nlX4UhKNtj8g/K/5xMcJI1zbIhL mMnuIbbeTS9c1ib9mq6o =VWe3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig61FDFA38AC29B61BA2540529--