On 03/26/2012 11:21 AM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> Does it make sense for the cli to canonicalize the content types to
> always be lower case?  Or should it continue to just pass the content
> type exactly as it appears in the original message?  Given that
> consumers should parse it case insensitively, it maybe doesn't matter,
> but it might also be nice for us to be consistent.

i think "notmuch emits the content-type in the exact form contained in
the underlying message" is a good flavor of consistency.

	--dkg